Give an editorial review

Make specific suggestions about structure, clarity, and evidence.

What this starting point does

Review the supplied draft for clarity, structure, and consistency. This is an editable instruction template, not a claim of tested performance on a particular model.

Make the inputs yours

• Reference material — fill {{MATERIAL}} with your own material, preserving line breaks where useful. This input is required for a filled prompt.

Reusable template

## Task
Review the supplied draft for clarity, structure, and consistency.

## Constraints
- Quote brief relevant passages when identifying issues.
- Separate factual questions from style preferences.
- Preserve the author’s intended voice.

## Output format
Overall assessment, prioritized edits with reasons, and sample revisions

## Reference material
<source_material>
{{MATERIAL}}
</source_material>

A filled example

This example uses fictional demonstration material. It is an example prompt, not a generated answer or image.

## Task
Review the supplied draft for clarity, structure, and consistency.

## Constraints
- Quote brief relevant passages when identifying issues.
- Separate factual questions from style preferences.
- Preserve the author’s intended voice.

## Output format
Overall assessment, prioritized edits with reasons, and sample revisions

## Reference material
<source_material>
Our tool makes handovers clearer. It keeps a checklist in the browser. We have not yet tested whether it reduces handover time.
</source_material>

Before using it

Review every instruction and replace the example material. Check that its constraints fit your task. The structural Analyzer can flag specific issues, but cannot verify facts or guarantee the quality of a model’s response.