Compare sources carefully

Separate agreement, disagreement, evidence, and uncertainty.

What this starting point does

Compare the supplied sources on their central claims and supporting evidence. This is an editable instruction template, not a claim of tested performance on a particular model.

Make the inputs yours

• Reference material — fill {{MATERIAL}} with your own material, preserving line breaks where useful. This input is required for a filled prompt.

Reusable template

## Task
Compare the supplied sources on their central claims and supporting evidence.

## Constraints
- Attribute claims to their source.
- Do not invent sources or fill missing evidence.
- Distinguish disagreement from differences in scope.

## Output format
Source overview, comparison table, evidence gaps, and unresolved questions

## Reference material
<source_material>
{{MATERIAL}}
</source_material>

A filled example

This example uses fictional demonstration material. It is an example prompt, not a generated answer or image.

## Task
Compare the supplied sources on their central claims and supporting evidence.

## Constraints
- Attribute claims to their source.
- Do not invent sources or fill missing evidence.
- Distinguish disagreement from differences in scope.

## Output format
Source overview, comparison table, evidence gaps, and unresolved questions

## Reference material
<source_material>
Source A: an internal note recommends a shared checklist for consistency. Source B: interview notes ask for flexibility in unusual handovers. Neither includes measured outcomes.
</source_material>

Before using it

Review every instruction and replace the example material. Check that its constraints fit your task. The structural Analyzer can flag specific issues, but cannot verify facts or guarantee the quality of a model’s response.